FundingTicks vs Bulenox
Side-by-side comparison of scoring, highlights, cautions, and key rules.
| Category | FundingTicks | Bulenox |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 64/100 | 58/100 |
| Rules | 17/30 | 16/30 |
| Payout | 17/25 | 10/25 |
| Pricing | 13/20 | 14/20 |
| Trust | 9/15 | 10/15 |
| Platform | 8/10 | 8/10 |
FundingTicks highlights
- No daily loss limit; EOD-based trailing max loss
- Payouts as often as every 5 trading days
- Flat 90% profit split across accounts
- EOD trail reduces intraday stop-outs vs intraday-trailing models
- Multiple plan types (Pro+/One/Zero) to fit preferences
FundingTicks cautions
- Monthly subscription fees on most plans
- Strict ~25% daily profit consistency rule on many plans
- Tier-1 news window restrictions in funded accounts; profits forfeited if violated
- 2% max risk per trade enforced; layering/oversizing can trigger flags
- Inactivity suspensions after ~7 days without trading
Bulenox highlights
- One-step evaluation
- Multiple account sizes; intraday or EOD trailing options
- Weekly payouts (processed Wednesdays)
- 100% of first $10k profits; 90% thereafter
- Choice of drawdown model to fit trading style
- Clear, published payout cadence and thresholds
Bulenox cautions
- 40% consistency rule on withdrawals (best day ≤ 40% of total profits)
- Staged payout caps for first 3 withdrawals; safety threshold must remain
- Inactivity suspensions if no trades for 5 consecutive trading days
- Minimum withdrawal typically $1,000
- Must leave required buffer in the account after payout
Who it's for
FundingTicks suits traders prioritizing overall transparency and scoring, while Bulenox may appeal for specific preferences.