FundingTicks vs Halcyon Trader Funding
Side-by-side comparison of scoring, highlights, cautions, and key rules.
| Category | FundingTicks | Halcyon Trader Funding |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 64/100 | 95/100 |
| Rules | 17/30 | 30/30 |
| Payout | 17/25 | 23/25 |
| Pricing | 13/20 | 19/20 |
| Trust | 9/15 | 14/15 |
| Platform | 8/10 | 9/10 |
FundingTicks highlights
- No daily loss limit; EOD-based trailing max loss
- Payouts as often as every 5 trading days
- Flat 90% profit split across accounts
- EOD trail reduces intraday stop-outs vs intraday-trailing models
- Multiple plan types (Pro+/One/Zero) to fit preferences
FundingTicks cautions
- Monthly subscription fees on most plans
- Strict ~25% daily profit consistency rule on many plans
- Tier-1 news window restrictions in funded accounts; profits forfeited if violated
- 2% max risk per trade enforced; layering/oversizing can trigger flags
- Inactivity suspensions after ~7 days without trading
Halcyon Trader Funding highlights
- No daily loss limits and no consistency rules
- One-time evaluation fee; no time limit to pass
- Payouts available every 10 active trading days
- 90% profit split (Ultra: 100%)
- Ultra accounts: EOD trailing drawdown + 100% profit share
- News trading allowed; DCA/scaling allowed
- CME market data included during evaluation
- Simple rule-set; minimal restrictions compared to peers
Halcyon Trader Funding cautions
- All positions must be closed daily (≈4:45 pm ET); no overnight holds
- First payout requires meeting minimum withdrawal threshold ($250)
Who it's for
Halcyon Trader Funding suits traders prioritizing overall transparency and scoring, while FundingTicks may appeal for specific preferences.